Aiken v. Hall et al
| Jay Junior Aiken |
| Chip L. Hall, Linda LNU, Charlie LNU and John Bucanon |
| 1:2017cv00097 |
| April 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Jackson |
| Frank D. Whitney |
| Prison Condition |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 12/13/2019. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ni)
|
|
Filing
48
ROSEBORO ORDER directing Plaintiff to respond to 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Response due by 7/16/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 07/02/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ni)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying as moot 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; denying 42 , 43 Plaintiff's Motions to Compel; granting 44 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, and the Defendant shall have 21 days from this Order to re spond to Plaintiff's request for production of documents. The stay of the Court's deadline to complete discovery is hereby LIFTED and the parties are directed that no further discovery shall be sought by either party in this matter or filed with the Court. (See order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/27/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (khm)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 32 Motion for discovery from Sheriff Chip Hall is DENIED. Plaintiff's 32 Motion for discovery to continue is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's 32 Motion for an open trial is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in accordance with the terms of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/6/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(kby)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that Deft shall respond to Pltf's 33 MOTION to Compel Discovery or file a status report with the Court within 10 days of this Order in accordance with terms of this Order, (Response or Status Report due by 6/15/20 19); and deadline for discovery and for filing of dispositive motions as set forth in the Court's 30 Pretrial Order and Case Management are hereby held in abeyance until further order of this Court. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/04/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that the U.S. Marshal is hereby ordered to use reasonable efforts to locate and obtain service on Defendant Linda Lee in accordance with Rule 4. Furthermore, Defendant Hall shall now be dismissed as a Defendant in this action. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/16/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (khm)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 16 Declaration for Entry of Default. The Clerk shall add Sheriff Hall as a defendant in his official capacity, and the USM shall serve Sheriff Hall upon submission of summons by Plaintiff. Once the full name of Linda LNU is identified, the Court will order USM to serve. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/28/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tmg)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying as premature Pltf's 12 Letter/Motion requesting permission to file discovery documents. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/30/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb) (Main Document 14 replaced on 1/30/2018 with PDF with blank 2nd page removed.) NEF Regenerated. (ejb).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint survives initial review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), as to Defendant Nurse Lind LNU, but the remaining Defendants will be dismissed from this action. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/1/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(khm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
