McNeilly v. Norman et al
| Mary McNeilly |
| Alan Norman, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Durwin Briscoe, David Gibson, A.D. McCray, Brittany Morton, James D. Oaks, Jordan T. Perkins, M.R. Ussery, Todd A. Wyllis and R.N. Westbrook |
| 1:2017cv00286 |
| October 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Cleveland |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER denying Pltf's 49 Motion for Reconsideration re: 34 Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/22/2019. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER: The Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Certify Order for Appeal is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/10/2018. (maf)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER: Plaintiff's 32 Objections are OVERRULED; the 31 Memorandum and Recommendation is ACCEPTED; the Magistrate Judge's 18 Order allowing the amendment to the Complaint is VACATED; and the Defendants 9; 27 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The 27 Motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants Southern Health Partners, Inc., Teresa Smith, Crystal Lail, Pamela Patterson, and Manuel Maldonado are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and DENIED to the extent the Defendants sought dismissal with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/7/2018. (maf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
