Koon v. Hooks

Petitioner: Rodney A. Koon
Respondent: Eric A. Hooks
Case Number: 1:2018cv00111
Filed: April 24, 2018
Court: North Carolina Western District Court
Office: Asheville Office
County: XX, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Frank D. Whitney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 1, 2018 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Clerk shall transfer the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1 ) to civil case 1:18-cv-00084-FDW, where it should be docketed as an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Clerk is respectfully requested to then close the instant case. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/1/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Koon v. Hooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rodney A. Koon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric A. Hooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?