Oppenheimer v. Fitzpatrick et al
| David Oppenheimer |
| Digital South Media Group LLC, Robert E Somes, Christopher Wotell, Peak Real Estate, Inc., James Fitzpatrick, Robert E. Somes and Digital South Media Group |
| 1:2018cv00257 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of a copyright action regarding copyright numbers VAu-1-132-213. (khm) Modified text on 9/12/2018 (ejb). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ejb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(khm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-3804885), filed by David Oppenheimer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Original Photo, #3 Exhibit B - Copyright Registration, #4 Exhibit C - Infringing Photo, #5 Exhibit D - 8-19-18 C&D Letter, #6 Exhibit E - LeJune C&D Letter)(LeJune, Dana) Modified text of Attachment #1 on 9/12/2018 (khm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
