Harper v. Greenidge et al
| Kim L. Harper |
| Sonya G. Thomas, Beth Harper Rodriguez and Rochelle Harper Greenidge |
| 1:2018cv00283 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Dennis Howell |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Contract: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order with MEMORANDUM in Support by Kim L. Harper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Certificate of Service) (ejb) |
| Case referral reassigned to Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(nvc) |
| Filing Fee Received: $ 400.00, receipt number CHD050681 (brj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally on plaintiff at the public counter at the time of case filing. (maf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Rochelle Harper Greenidge, Beth Harper Rodriguez, and Sonya G. Thomas. (Summons provided to plaintiff at the public counter) (maf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kim L. Harper against Rochelle Harper Greenidge, Beth Harper Rodriguez, and Sonya G. Thomas. ($400 filing fee received and forwarded to Charlotte for processing) (Attachment: #1 Cover Sheet) (maf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
