Wright v. Case et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence Wright
Defendant: Mr. Orlando Case and Mrs. Orlando Case
Case Number: 1:2018cv00288
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Mr. Orlando Case, Mrs. Orlando Case. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(kby)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff shall prepare summonses for all appropriate parties and submit the summons to the Clerk within seven (7) days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 11/6/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(kby)
November 5, 2018 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf: #3 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(thh)
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kby)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Text of Order: The Plaintiff's application fails to provide all the information necessary to determine whether the Plaintiff has sufficient resources from which to pay the filing fee for this action. As such, the Plaintiff's Application is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should the Plaintiff refile his application, he should use the Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (AO 239), a copy of which shall be sent to the Plaintiff along with this Order. So Ordered. Entered by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/11/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(LMR)
October 10, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence Wright. (kby)
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mr. Orlando Case, Mrs. Orlando Case, filed by Lawrence Wright.(kby) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/11/2018: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope, #4 Proposed Summons) (kby).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Case et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Orlando Case
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. Orlando Case
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?