Lail v. Slagle et al
Avery Joe Lail, Jr. |
Mike Slagle, Kella J. Phillips and Cleveland Riddle |
1:2018cv00291 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Frank D Whitney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 10/16/18. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw) |
Filing 3 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #2 is GRANTED. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), the correctional facility where Plaintiff is incarcerated is required to deduct monthly payments of 20% of the preceding months income credited to Plaintiff's trust fund account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. Monthly payments are to be sent to the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina until the statutory fee of $350.00 is paid in full. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/16/18. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Avery Joe Lail, Jr. (emw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Slagle, Cleveland Riddle, and Kella J. Phillips, with Jury Demand, filed by Avery Joe Lail, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(emw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.