United States of America v. Approximately $7,500.00 in U.S. Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $7,500.00 in U.S. Currency |
James Hunter Rogers |
1:2018cv00321 |
November 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 0881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by James Hunter Rogers.(Hedrick, Edward) |
Filing 5 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date December 8, 2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Declaration of Publication))(Letzring, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 CLAIM Verified Claim for Seized Property by James Hunter Rogers. (Hedrick, Edward) |
Filing 3 USMS Return of Service for Warrant for Arrest In Rem served on 11/08/18. (emw) (Main Document 3 replaced on 11/14/2018) (emw). NEF regenerated. |
Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest In Rem of Property. Signed by Clerk Frank G. Johns on 11/07/18. (emw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem (Verified) against Approximately $7,500.00 in U.S. Currency, filed by United States of America.(Letzring, Jonathan) |
Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(emw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.