Neal et al v. Janssen
| 1:2018mc00030 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Other |
| Registration of Foreign Judgment |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER the U.S. Marshal's Service is respectfully DIRECTED to return the property levied on in this matter, to wit: a pair of Gucci sunglasses, to Deft c/o his counsel of record. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/25/2019. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying Pltfs' 12 MOTION for Disbursement of Property; and directing Pltfs to file, within 10 days of entry of this Order (due by 3/18/2019), a notice advising as to whether they request that an execution sale be conducted. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/07/2019. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added Rachel A. Washburn for Tyrone K. Neal in his capacity as the Executor of the Estate of John R. Neal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 9/12/2018. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Issuance of Writ of Execution Without Notice of Exemptions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 09/05/18. (emw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Neal et al v. Janssen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
