Humphries v. Hooks
Kenneth David Humphries |
Erik A. Hooks |
1:2019cv00069 |
March 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Frank D Whitney |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing Fee Received: $ 5.00, receipt number CHD052903. (jaw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00 Received, forwarded to CLT for receipt), filed by Kenneth David Humphries. (Attachments: #1 Copies of State Court Documents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(nvc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Humphries v. Hooks | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Erik A. Hooks | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kenneth David Humphries | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.