Equis Financial Inc. v. Chaulk
| Equis Financial Inc. |
| Christopher Lee Chaulk |
| 1:2019cv00259 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Equis Financial Inc. (Norman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 Amended MOTION to Dismiss by Christopher Lee Chaulk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Warren, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 Amended MOTION to Dismiss by Christopher Lee Chaulk. Responses due by 11/8/2019 (Warren, Jeffrey). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. (Main Document 8 replaced on 10/28/2019) (rys). Regenerated NEF on 10/28/2019 (rys). |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Text of Order: In light of the filing of the Amended Complaint, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. So Ordered. Entered by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/18/19. (LMR)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Christopher Lee Chaulk, filed by Equis Financial Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Norman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue by Christopher Lee Chaulk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit)(Warren, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue by Christopher Lee Chaulk. Responses due by 10/11/2019 (Warren, Jeffrey). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Equis Financial Inc.. Christopher Lee Chaulk served on 9/16/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Norman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equis Financial Inc. (Norman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Christopher Lee Chaulk. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ejb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christopher Lee Chaulk ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4171438), filed by Equis Financial Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Norman, Benjamin) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equis Financial Inc. v. Chaulk | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher Lee Chaulk | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Steven Warren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equis Financial Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Raymond Norman |
| Represented By: | Robert J King, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
