Flannery v. Saul
| Lisa M. Flannery |
| Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 1:2019cv00319 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by George Davidson on behalf of Andrew Saul (Davidson, George) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Social Security Administration (SSA) served on 11/15/2019, answer due 1/14/2020. (reh) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Andrew M. Saul, US Attorney, and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285s)(ni) |
Filing 3
ORDER (Sealed - Participants) granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk is directed to issue summons and provide to USMS for service upon defendant. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/14/2019. (ni)
|
| Filing 5 ***Please disregard, docketed in wrong case. |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa M. Flannery. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(Stepp, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Lisa M. Flannery.(Stepp, Christopher) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
