Marion v. Hooks, et al
Tiffany Leigh Marion |
Eric A. Hooks and Miranda Richardson |
1:2020cv00073 |
March 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Martin Reidinger |
Frank D Whitney |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Status of State Court Proceedings by Tiffany Leigh Marion re #2 MOTION to Stay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Miller, Lauren) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger. Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(thh) |
Filing 4 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by Mary Carla Babb on behalf of Miranda Richardson, Eric A. Hooks, Attorney Clarence Joe DelForge, III terminated. (Babb, Mary) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Tiffany Leigh Marion. Responses due by 4/8/2020 (Miller, Lauren) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Stay re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Tiffany Leigh Marion. Responses due by 4/8/2020 (Miller, Lauren) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0419-4436833.), filed by Tiffany Leigh Marion. (Attachments: #1 Index to Exhibits, #2 Appendix, #3 MAR Hearing Transcript, #4 Trial Transcript)(Miller, Lauren) Modified attachment descriptions on 3/25/2020. (maf) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (maf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.