Homburg v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. et al
Dieter Homburg |
Caddis Funding, LLC, Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. and Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. doing business as FBCS, Inc. |
1:2020cv00142 |
June 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Caddis Funding, LLC. (Dixon, Joshua). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Caddis Funding, LLC answer due 8/12/2020. Text of Order: ORDER: The Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint is GRANTED, and the deadline for Defendant Caddis Funding, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED by seven (7) days, through and including August 12, 2020. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 8/5/2020. (kkb) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Caddis Funding, LLC answer due 8/5/2020. Text of Order: ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Motion, and it appearing that Mr. Dixon has made an appearance on behalf of Caddis Funding, LLC, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint is GRANTED, and the deadline for Caddis Funding, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED through and including August 5, 2020. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 7/16/2020. (kkb) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Caddis Funding, LLC. (Dixon, Joshua). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
Filing 5 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. d/b/a FBSC, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED by 21 days, through and including 8/11/2020. The request to extend the deadline by which Caddis Funding, LLC must answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 7/15/2020. (khm) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc.. (Dixon, Joshua). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dieter Homburg. Caddis Funding, LLC served on 6/24/2020, answer due 7/15/2020. (Brown, Chris) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. and Caddis Funding, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachment: #1 Summons - Caddis Funding, LLC) (maf) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (maf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caddis Funding, LLC, Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4529250), filed by Dieter Homburg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - December 13, 2019 Letter from FBCS, #2 Exhibit B - Dispute Letter to FBCS, #3 Exhibit C - FBCS's January 15, 2020 Letter, #4 Cover Sheet)(Brown, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.