Gee v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
Oliver Gee |
Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
1:2020cv00159 |
June 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledged receipt of electronically transferred case by USDC Southern District of Ohio, their civil action no. 2:20-cv-03763(rth) |
Filing 2 Transfer Order of Judicial Panel MDL transferring case to Southern District of Ohio, MDL# 2846 (CTO-58). Matter transferred for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. (thh) |
Case electronically transferred to District of Southern District of Ohio. Original electronic file and docket sheet sent. (thh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4547912), filed by Oliver Gee. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Williams, Jeremy) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.