Caturano v. Armchem International Corp.
John Caturano |
Armchem International Corp |
1:2020cv00173 |
July 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from NC Superior Court of Buncombe County, case number 20CV01793. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4561713), filed by Armchem International Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B. Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Williamson, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Caturano v. Armchem International Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Armchem International Corp | |
Represented By: | Stephen B. Williamson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John Caturano | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.