Davis v. Lonardo et al
Jason P. Davis |
Christy Lonardo, Jonny Lonardo and Giving Hope Retreat |
1:2020cv00208 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER re #5 MOTION for Warrant filed by Jason P. Davis. Text of Order: The Defendants Motion is DENIED, as the Judgment in this case has been entered and the case concluded So Ordered. Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/15/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(kby) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Warrant by Jason P. Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kby) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 8/10/2020. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ni) |
Filing 3 ORDER on initial review DISMISSING CASE without prejudice as factually or legally baseless. Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is ALLOWED. Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/10/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ni) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason P Davis. (reh) Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jason P Davis. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(reh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2020: #2 Proposed Summons) (reh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.