Bumgardner v. Rich et al
| Zachary Bumgardner |
| Nelson Scott Rich and John Gangluff |
| 1:2020cv00301 |
| October 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail ( #5 ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account) addressed to Zachary Bumgardner 1565545, Polk Correctional Institution, Box 2500 Butner, NC 27509 returned as undeliverable. (rhf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Zachary Bumgardner. New Address is: 514 E. Main St., Spindale, NC 28160. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 10/22/2020.(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(reh)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (reh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Future Change of Address by Zachary Bumgardner and request to Clerk to send documents to current address as well as future address (Zachary Bumgardner, Trosa, 1820 James Street, Durham, NC 27707. (reh) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Zachary Bumgardner. (reh) Modified text on 10/21/2020 (reh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Zachary Bumgardner.(reh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/30/2020: #1 Proposed Summons) (reh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
