Stinson v. Taylor et al
| George Stinson |
| FNU Taylor and FNU Bright |
| 1:2020cv00355 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Directing Full Payment be made from Prison Account of George Stinson and directing correctional facility to transmit payments. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) by NCDPS on behalf of George Stinson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 12/9/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(rhf)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS: Advising Plaintiff of several essential requirements of proceeding in this Court. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf) Modified text on 12/9/2020 (ejb).
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by George Stinson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) submitted directly by George Stinson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by George Stinson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with jury demand, filed by George Stinson against FNU Bright & FNU Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (maf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
