Moore v. Fox et al
| Dwight Wayne Moore, Jr. |
| FNU Webb, FNU Mace, FNU Fox and FNU McClean |
| 1:2020cv00359 |
| December 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Dwight Wayne Moore, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (hms) |
Filing 6
ORDER Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Directing Monthly Payments be Made from Prison Account of Dwight Wayne Moore Jr. Directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 12/20/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(hms)
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) submitted by NCDPS on behalf of Dwight Wayne Moore, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rhf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 12/7/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(rhf)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Clerk of Court on 12/4/2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(rhf)
|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Dwight Wayne Moore, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rhf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Dwight Wayne Moore, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(rhf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
