Parker v. Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC
Lesa Parker |
Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC |
1:2020cv00385 |
December 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of Hearing: Telephone Conference set for 2/23/2021 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Counsel for the parties shall call into the conference line five minutes prior to the conference. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. Clerk will contact parties with call-in information. (kby) |
Filing 7 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Stanton, Corey) |
NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 2/11/2021. (ejb) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC.(Clare, Christopher) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Lesa Parker. Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Leis, Craig) Modified text of Attachment #1 on 1/21/2021 (ejb). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Corey Michael Stanton on behalf of Lesa Parker (Stanton, Corey) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip J. Gibbons, Jr on behalf of Lesa Parker (Gibbons, Philip) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (rhf) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(rhf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0419-4815851), filed by Lesa Parker.(Leis, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parker v. Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lesa Parker | |
Represented By: | Craig Lorne Leis |
Represented By: | Philip J. Gibbons, Jr |
Represented By: | Corey Michael Stanton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Encore Rehabilitation Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Christopher Bradley Clare |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.