Mosca v. Madara et al
| Carol Mosca |
| Janet Woodcock, Rochelle P. Walensky, Francis S. Collins, Susan Orsega, Norris Cochran, James L. Madara and Jane Nishida |
| 1:2021cv00027 |
| February 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 3/5/2021. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns, on 3/5/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf) |
Filing 3
ORDER: This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/5/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carol Mosca. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rhf). Modified on 2/5/2021 to remove referral of motion to W. Carleton Metcalf. (khm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Equitable Relief against All Defendants, filed by Carol Mosca. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Envelope) (rhf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
