Hyatt v. State of North Carolina et al
| Terry Alvin Hyatt |
| Don Gast, Ann Benjamin, Rodney G. Hasty, Tim Shook and State of North Carolina |
| 1:2021cv00053 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk of Court shall docket Petitioner's #3 Motion to Withdraw as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and close the instant civil action. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/12/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
| The Clerk has terminated this action in light of the Plaintiff's #3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal and the Court's #4 Order. (maf) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Terry Alvin Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) Modified on 4/12/2021 per #4 Order. (maf) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus-False Imprisonment. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 3/15/2021. (ejb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus-False Imprisonment, filed by Terry Alvin Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
