Corey v. Madden et al
| Thomas Adam Corey |
| TJ Madden and Melven Lytle |
| 1:2021cv00073 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) |
| Filing 11 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Thomas Adam Corey. New address: Sampson Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 1109, Clinton, NC 28329. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hms) |
Filing 9
ORDER Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Directing Monthly Payments be Made from Prison Account of Thomas Adam Corey. Directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 05/03/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS: Advising Plaintiff of several essential requirements of proceeding in this Court. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to update the docket to reflect Plaintiff's pro se prisoner status, and to treat Plaintiff's pending motions accordingly. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff's apparent current place of incarceration, Piedmont Correctional Institution. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/19/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
| Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf no longer assigned to case. (maf) |
| Pro Se Law Clerk Referral to PSLC: 1. (maf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: By 4/9/2021 Plaintiff shall file a Notice: 1) Stating whether Plaintiff was incarcerated or detained in any facility because he was accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program at the time he filed the Complaint on 3/17/2021; and 2) Providing Plaintiff's current mailing address. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/29/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (rhf) Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/29/2021) (rhf). Modified with corrected PDF on 3/29/2021 (rhf). |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Support of IFP, #2 Envelope) (rhf) Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. (Main Document 2 replaced on 3/29/2021) (rhf). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/29/2021) (rhf). Modified with corrected PDFs on 3/29/2021 (rhf). Modified docket text on 4/19/2021 pursuant to #5 Order. (maf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Thomas Adam Corey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope) (rhf) (Main Document 1 replaced on 3/29/2021) (rhf). (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/29/2021) (rhf). Modified with corrected PDF on 3/29/2021, NEF regenerated (rhf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
