Murray v. State of North Carolina
| Russell Edward Murray |
| State of North Carolina |
| 1:2021cv00075 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number CHD064635.), filed by Russell Edward Murray. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (hms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murray v. State of North Carolina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Russell Edward Murray | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: State of North Carolina | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.