Jones et al v. Trump
| Frederick K. Jones and Kathryn Reiter |
| Donald J. Trump |
| 1:2021cv00163 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned (Docs. #4 and #5 ) addressed to Frederick K. Jones, New Orleans VA Medical Center, 2400 Canal St., New Orleans, LA 70119. Documents RE-SENT via ECF Document Email: Document 4, Document 5, sent to ferdkjones2@gmail.com; fredkjones2@gmail.com. (khm) (khm). Modified text on 8/9/2021. (khm) Modified restriction of entry on 8/11/2021 (ejb). |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 7/19/2021. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(maf) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs' #1 Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing. Plaintiffs' #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 7/19/2021. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick K. Jones, Kathryn Reiter. (rhf) Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donald J. Trump, filed by Frederick K. Jones, Kathryn Reiter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (rhf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
