Guilkey v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Christopher Guilkey |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00252 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT-ONLY Social Security Scheduling Order. It Appearing to the Court that the defendant Commissioner has answered and filed transcripts herein, that the issues are ripe for this Court's Review. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.2. (Plaintiff shall be permitted one response within 14 days after the filing of Commissioner's Motion) Plaintiff SS Motion for Summary Judgment due by 1/14/2022. Government SS Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/15/2022. Entered by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 11/15/2021. (kby)
|
| Filing 8 Administrative Record - Social Security Transcript (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records Part 1, #9 Medical Records Part 2, #10 Medical Records Part 3, #11 Medical Records Part 4)(Russell, Mary Ellen) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Russell, Mary Ellen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Ellen Russell on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Russell, Mary Ellen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/24/2021, answer due 11/23/2021. (dgr) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM-285s) (ejb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Pltf's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve process upon Deft at government expense. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on 9/23/2021. (ejb)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Guilkey. (Piemonte, George) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Christopher Guilkey.(Piemonte, George) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (rhf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guilkey v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Guilkey | |
| Represented By: | George C. Piemonte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Mary Ellen Russell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
