Vang v. United Heartland & CV Industries Inc et al
Plaintiff: Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant: United Heartland & CV Industries Inc, Lauren Malich, Melissa Mitchell and Scott Coe
Case Number: 1:2021cv00355
Filed: December 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 1/19/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that Pltf's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; and the Pltf's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 1/19/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
December 14, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis *(Short Form) by Pakuja Crystal Vang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope) (ejb). Modified *text on 12/17/2021 (ejb). Modified on 1/3/2022 to remove referral of motion to W. Carleton Metcalf. (khm)
December 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Heartland & CV Industries Inc, Lauren Malich, Melissa Mitchell, Scott Coe, filed by Pakuja Crystal Vang. (Attachments: #1 Photos Exhibits part 1, #2 Exhibits, #3 Sealed Medical Records Exhibits (Sealed - Participants), #4 Photos Exhibits part 2, #5 Medical Bills Exhibits, #6 Text Messages Exhibits, #7 USB Flash Drive Exhibit Manually filed, #8 Envelope) (ejb) Modified on 12/17/2021 to restrict access to Attachment #3 to Case Participants Crystal Vang, United Heartland & CV Industries Inc, Lauren Malich, Melissa Mitchell, and Scott Coe. NEF Regenerated (ejb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vang v. United Heartland & CV Industries Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pakuja Crystal Vang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Heartland & CV Industries Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lauren Malich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Coe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?