Oppenheimer v. Scarafile et al
David Oppenheimer |
Michael Scarafile, Patricia Scarafile, Shelia Romanosky, O'Shaughnessy Real Estate Inc and Performance Impressions, LLC |
1:2021mc00019 |
August 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
David Keesler |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Copyright |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Acknowledged receipt of electronically transferred case by USDC District of South Carolina, their civil action no. 2:21-mc-00517. (rth) |
Case electronically transferred to District of District of South Carolina. Original electronic file and docket sheet sent. (mga) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's - And Non-Party Performance Impressions, LLC's - Motion to Transfer Venue. Defendants' First Motion to Compel Non-Party to Produce Requested Discovery Under Subpoena (Document No. 1) shall be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for further consideration and disposition, and this action shall be CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/26/21. (mga) |
Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 MOTION to Compel by O'Shaughnessy Real Estate Inc, Shelia Romanosky, Michael Scarafile, Patricia Scarafile. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Deposition Excerpt)(Wilkerson, David) Modified text on 8/25/2021 (kby). |
Filing 4 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION to Change Venue to Dist. of South Carolina Defendant's Reply Indicating No Opposition to Motion to Transfer Venue by O'Shaughnessy Real Estate Inc, Shelia Romanosky, Michael Scarafile, Patricia Scarafile. Replies due by 8/27/2021 (Wilkerson, David) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Compel ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number 0419-5152371) subject to PI's Mtn to Change Venue [ECF No. 2] by David Oppenheimer. Replies due by 8/26/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - C&D Letter, #2 Exhibit 2 - Defs' Obj and Resp to 1st Irogs, #3 Exhibit 3 - Defs' Obj and Resp to 2nd Irogs, #4 Exhibit 4 - 11-10-2016 Email)(LeJune, Dana) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Change Venue to Dist. of South Carolina by David Oppenheimer. Responses due by 9/2/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - PI 1st Amended Obj and Resp to Subpoena, #2 Exhibit 2 - Plf's Obj and Resp to 2nd RFA, #3 Exhibit 3 - Defs' Memo in Support of Emergency Mtn, #4 Exhibit 4 - DSC Order on Mtn to Compel, #5 Exhibit 5 - Defs' Renewed Mtn to Compel, #6 Exhibit 6 - Plf's Memo in Opposition, #7 Exhibit 7 - Defs' Reply) (LeJune, Dana). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Case Referral reassigned to Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf no longer assigned to the case. Motions referred to David Keesler: #1 MOTION to Compel (Filing fee $ 49 receipt number 0419-5152371). This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
NOTICE: Case was filed as a CV case in error. Should have been filed as a MC case instead. Case has been copied from 1:21-cv-207 to 1:21-mc-19. Please use 1:21-mc-19 for all future pleadings. (ejb) |
Case assigned to District Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Compel ( Filing fee $ 49 receipt number 0419-5152371), filed by Michael Scarafile, Shelia Romanosky, O'Shaughnessy Real Estate Inc, Patricia Scarafile. Responses due by 8/19/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit 1, Deposition Notice, #3 Exhibit 2, District of South Carolina Order, #4 Exhibit 3, Objections and Response to Subpoena)(Wilkerson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.