Seay v. Webb
Clant M. Seay |
Tim Webb and Erin Cabe-Webb |
1:2022cv00020 |
February 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Tim Webb and Erin Cabe-Webb re: #4 Amended Complaint. (ejb) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Tim Webb, Erin Cabe-Webb, filed by Clant M. Seay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 4A, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17) (ejb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Tim Webb. (ejb) |
Filing 2 Request to Receive Electronic Notification by Clant M. Seay. (ejb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tim Webb with Jury Demand ($ 402 Filing fee received and mailed to Charlotte Clerk's Office to receipt), filed by Clant M. Seay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Civil Cover Sheet) (ejb) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally at case filing. (ejb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.