Gouge v. Jear Logistics, LLC et al
| Danny Gouge |
| Jear Logistics, LLC, Anyway Logistics, Inc., Austin A. Loza, Jr. and Agustin A. Loza, Jr. |
| 1:2022cv00040 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Agustin A. Loza, Jr.(Harmon, David) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Danny Gouge. All Defendants. (Bailey, Derrick) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David Michael Harmon on behalf of Agustin A. Loza, Jr (Harmon, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Michael Harmon on behalf of Anyway Logistics, Inc. (Harmon, David) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Agustin A. Loza, Jr. Answer due 4/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/25/2022. (hms)
|
| Filing 8 Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by *Agustin A. Loza, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (hms) Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. Modified *text to replace Jear Logistics, LLC with *Agustin A. Loza, Jr. as the filer of this motion on 3/31/2022. (ejb). |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Jear Logistics, LLC answer due 4/25/2022. Text of Order: ORDER: Defendant Jear Logistics, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED, and the deadline for Jear Logistics, LLC to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED through and including April 25, 2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/15/2022. (kkb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Richard Harris on behalf of Jear Logistics, LLC (Harris, Jason) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Jear Logistics, LLC. (King, Todd). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd A. King on behalf of Jear Logistics, LLC (King, Todd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting *without prejudice #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, added F. Braxton Terry for Danny Gouge. *(See Order for further details.) (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 3/8/2022. (ejb) Modified *text on 3/8/2022. NEF Regenerated (ejb).
|
| Notice to Attorney F. Braxton Terry: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 3/15/2022. (ejb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to F. Braxton Terry Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-5469400. by Danny Gouge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tennessee Certificate) (Bailey, Derrick). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Jear Logistics, LLC, Anyway Logistics, Inc., Austin A. Loza, Jr. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ejb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5449765), filed by Danny Gouge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Bailey, Derrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
