Mann v. Trails Carolina LLC
| Dr. James Moss Mann and James Moss Mann |
| Trails Carolina LLC |
| 1:2022cv00042 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Trails Carolina LLC. All Defendants. (Levy, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Levy on behalf of Trails Carolina LLC (Levy, David) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Trails Carolina LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against *Trails Carolina LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5452105), filed by James Moss Mann. (Blake, Shaun) Modified *text to correct name of party Complaint is filed against on 2/24/2022. NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
| NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division. Case has been copied from 3:22-cv-00076 to 1:22-cv-42. Please use 1:22-cv-42 for all future pleadings. (js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
