Parsons v. United Collections Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff: Eric Devon Parsons
Defendant: United Collections Bureau, Inc. and United Collections Bureau, Inc. doing business as UCB, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00170
Filed: August 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: 1) Plaintiff's Notice of Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision on Motion to Remand (Doc. #7 ) is GRANTED IN PART and the Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #12 ) is GRANTED. 2) Should the Motion to Remand be allowed, Defendant need not file a response before the matter is remanded. 3) Should the Motion to Remand be denied, Defendant shall respond to the Complaint no later than 14 days after the entry of the Order denying the Motion to Remand. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 10/6/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by United Collections Bureau, Inc.. (Williams, Benjamin). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 "Plaintiff's Notice of No Intent to Reply Pursuant to LCvR 7.1(e)" by Eric Devon Parsons. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rhf)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of intent not to file reply to Deft's #8 Response in Opposition to Pltf's #6 MOTION to Remand and MOTION for Costs, Expenses, and Fees by Eric Devon Parsons. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #7 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Costs, Expenses, and Fees by United Collections Bureau, Inc.. Replies due by 9/29/2022 (Williams, Benjamin)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand MOTION for Costs, Expenses, and Fees by United Collections Bureau, Inc.. Replies due by 9/23/2022 (Williams, Benjamin)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of MOTION to Stay Proceeding Pending Decision on #6 MOTION to Remand and MOTION for Costs, Expenses, and Fees by Eric Devon Parsons. Responses due by 9/22/2022, (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope) (ejb). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of MOTION to Remand, and MOTION for Costs, Expenses, and Fees by Eric Devon Parsons. Responses due by 9/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (ejb). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting Deft's #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: [1-1] Complaint attached to #1 Notice of Removal. United Collections Bureau, Inc. answer due 10/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 9/1/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by United Collections Bureau, Inc.. (Williams, Benjamin). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Collections Bureau, Inc. (Williams, Benjamin)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Luke Williams on behalf of United Collections Bureau, Inc. (Williams, Benjamin)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (hms)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from North Carolina District Court, Cleveland County, case number 22-cvd-1313. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5716051), filed by United Collections Bureau, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice of Process of Service)(Williams, Benjamin) Modified text on 8/29/2022 (rth).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsons v. United Collections Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Devon Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Collections Bureau, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin Luke Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Collections Bureau, Inc. doing business as UCB, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin Luke Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?