McMahan v. Griffin et al
Plaintiff: Darryl K. McMahan
Defendant: Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company and Kenneth B. Clamser
Case Number: 1:2022cv00183
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing on Motions re: (10 in 1:22-cv-00136-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00171-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00172-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00173-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00174-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00175-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00176-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00177-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00178-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00179-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00181-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00182-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00183-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00184-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00185-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00186-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00187-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00188-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay , (5 in 1:22-cv-00189-MR-WCM) Consent MOTION to Stay , and (5 in 1:22-cv-00190-MR-WCM) MOTION to Stay : Motion Hearing set for 10/31/2022 10:30 AM in Courtroom, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kby)
October 13, 2022 Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Stay by Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company. (Perrin, Sean)
October 12, 2022 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay by Darryl K. McMahan. Replies due by 10/19/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Agan, Stephen)
October 12, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay by Darryl K. McMahan. Replies due by 10/19/2022 (Agan, Stephen)
September 28, 2022 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Stay by Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company. (Perrin, Sean)
September 28, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Stay by Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company. Responses due by 10/12/2022 (Perrin, Sean). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
September 28, 2022 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint contained in #1 Notice of Removal, by Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company.(Perrin, Sean)
September 2, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Western Surety Company (Perrin, Sean)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, . All Defendants. Text of Order: ORDER: The Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is GRANTED, and the deadline for Defendants to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED through and including September 30, 2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 9/1/2022. (kkb)
August 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin, Western Surety Company. (Perrin, Sean). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
August 29, 2022 Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Buncombe County Superior Court, case number 22-CVS-02693. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5717664), filed by Western Surety Company, Kenneth B. Clamser, Lowell S. Griffin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Buncombe County Superior Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal of Action to Federal Court)(Perrin, Sean)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McMahan v. Griffin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl K. McMahan
Represented By: George B. Hyler, Jr.
Represented By: Stephen P. Agan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lowell S. Griffin
Represented By: Sean F. Perrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Western Surety Company
Represented By: Sean F. Perrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth B. Clamser
Represented By: Sean F. Perrin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?