Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Joshua Morris
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Case Number: 1:2022cv00192
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/16/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (kab)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285s)(kby)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the Plaintiff's #2 Application is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee or giving security therefor. FURTHER ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's counsel shall prepare summonses for all appropriate parties and submit the summons to the Clerk via Cyberclerk within 7 days of entry of this Order; (2) Upon receipt of the summons, the Clerk shall deliver process to the United States Marshal for service; and (3) The United States Marshal shall serve process upon the Defendant at the expense of the United States Government. (Summons due by 9/14/2022.) Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/7/2022. (khm)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Morris. (Hall, Charlotte)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Joshua Morris.(Hall, Charlotte)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Morris
Represented By: Charlotte Williams Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?