Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Richard Eugene Hudson |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing |
1:2022cv00205 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Graham Mullen |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/28/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (kab) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney and US Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 USM 285)(kab) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to notify the United States Marshal who, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3), shall serve process upon Defendant. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 10/25/2022. (kab) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard Eugene Hudson. (Bowling, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Richard Eugene Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bowling, Russell) (Main Document 1 replaced with .pdf showing Deft's name corrected in case heading on 10/25/2022.) NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.