Riggs v. Walmart, Inc.
Karen M Riggs and Karen M. Riggs |
Walmart and Walmart, Inc. |
1:2022cv00207 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Max O Cogburn |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Walmart, Inc.. (Spainhour, Shannon). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint . Walmart, Inc. answer due 12/2/2022. Text of Order: ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Plead in Response to Complaint is GRANTED, and the deadline for Defendant to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED by thirty days, through and including December 2, 2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 10/18/2022. (kkb) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Walmart, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ejb) |
NOTICE: Case was filed in wrong division. Case has been copied from 3:22cv498 to 1:22cv207. Please use 1:22cv207 for all future pleadings. (cjs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Walmart with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5758267), filed by Karen M Riggs.(Field, J.) Modified docket text on 9/26/2022 (tlj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.