Russe v. Madison County Sheriff's Department et al
| Rupa Vickers Russe |
| Madison County Sheriff's Department, James Harwood, D. Joyner, County of Madison North Carolina, John Doe Corporation and Jane Doe Corporation |
| 1:2022cv00221 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Madison County Sheriff's Department, James Harwood, D. Joyner, County of Madison North Carolina, John Doe Corporation, and Jane Doe Corporation. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ejb) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rupa Vickers Russe (Russe, Rupa) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against *Madison County Sheriff's Department, James Harwood, D. Joyner, County of Madison North Carolina, John Doe Corporation, Jane Doe Corporation* ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5793409), filed by Rupa Vickers Russe.(Russe, Rupa) Modified *text* on 10/20/2022. NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
