Campbell v. LBM Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shannon Campbell
Defendant: LBM Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00229
Filed: October 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Max O Cogburn
Referring Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing:Initial Pretrial Conference (by video) set for 1/11/2023 09:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Hearing link provided by separate correspondence. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kby)
December 15, 2022 Filing 7 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Dressler, Brett)
November 22, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Shannon Campbell. LBM Industries, Inc. served on 11/1/2022, answer due 11/22/2022. (Dressler, Brett)
November 22, 2022 NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 12/13/2022. (ams)
November 21, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by LBM Industries, Inc..(Fitzgerald, Andrew)
October 28, 2022 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LBM Industries, Inc. (Fitzgerald, Andrew)
October 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew L. Fitzgerald on behalf of LBM Industries, Inc. (Fitzgerald, Andrew)
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to LBM Industries, Inc. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (khm)
October 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LBM Industries, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5803960), filed by Shannon Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Dressler, Brett)
October 26, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. and Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(khm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Campbell v. LBM Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Campbell
Represented By: Brett E. Dressler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LBM Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew L. Fitzgerald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?