Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Erin Rogers |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing |
| 1:2023cv00085 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/3/2023. (ejb)
|
| Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3; The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. (ejb) |
| Notice to answer Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on or by 60 days from the filing of this notice. (Commissioner of Social Security answer due 6/2/2023.) (ejb) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erin Rogers. (Arrowood, Derrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Erin Rogers.(Arrowood, Derrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
