Blunt Man Bob v. Campbell et al
Plaintiff: Blunt Man Bob and Paul Tay
Defendant: Debra Campbell and David Zack
Interested Party: City of Asheville, NC
Case Number: 1:2023cv00088
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Plaintiff shall file an amended application to proceed without the prepayment of fees or costs or pay the required filing fee within 10 days of the entry of this Order. The Plaintiff is specifically advised that failure to pay the required filing fee or file the proper application within the time required will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/24/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
April 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying without prejudice Pltf's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pltf is advised that any renewed request to proceed without the prepayment of costs should be submitted on the form referenced in this Order. Signed by US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 4/11/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Blunt Man Bob. (ejb). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 "PETITION for Preliminary Injunction to Enjoin the Defendants from Enforcing Anti-Camping Ordinances in accordance with Martin v. Boise" against Debra Campbell, David Zack, Ex Rel City of Asheville, NC, with Jury Demand, filed by Blunt Man Bob. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (ejb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blunt Man Bob v. Campbell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blunt Man Bob
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Tay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debra Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Zack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: City of Asheville, NC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?