Nance v. FaceBook et al
| Jo'Shon Nance |
| FaceBook and Mark Zuckerburg |
| 1:2023cv00116 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Asheville Office |
| Max O Cogburn |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Full Payment be made from Prison Account of Jo'Shon Nance and directing correctional facility to transmit payments. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (smm)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjs) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 5/16/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (slm)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Jo'Shon Nance (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement of Joshon D. Nance, #2 Envelope) (ejb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 4/27/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $350.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 5/18/2023. (ejb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FaceBook, Mark Zuckerburg with Jury Demand, filed by Jo'Shon Nance. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
