Marr v. Sainvelus et al
| Ricky Donovan Marr |
| Max Robensky Sainvelus and MJS Trucking LLC |
| 1:2023cv00266 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| W Carleton Metcalf |
| Martin Reidinger |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 DESIGNATION of Sharon Barrett as Mediator by all the parties. (Sullivan, Zephyr) |
| Filing 14 Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan: Estimated Trial Time: 3 days. Mediator Designation deadline set for 11/20/2023. Expert Reports-Plaintiff due by 2/9/2024. Expert Reports-Defendants due by 3/8/2024. Discovery due by 4/24/2024. Motions due by 5/24/2024. Mediation deadline set for 5/10/2024. Jury Trial set for 10/21/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 100 Otis St, Asheville, NC 28801 before US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Signed by US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 10/30/2023. (smm) |
| Minute Entry: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE held before US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Plaintiffs attorney: Kimberly Carpenter. Defendants attorney: Zephyr Sullivan. An initial pretrial conference was held by video conference on October 30, 2023 with Kimberly Carpenter participating on behalf of Plaintiff Ricky Donovan Marr and Zephyr Sullivan participating on behalf of Defendants Max Robensky Sainvelus and MJS Trucking LLC. A pretrial order will issue. (kkb) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Zephyr Jost Sullivan on behalf of All Defendants (Sullivan, Zephyr) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference (by video) set for 10/30/2023 09:00 AM in Chambers before US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Hearing link provided by separate correspondence. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kby) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by MJS Trucking LLC, Max Robensky Sainvelus.(Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Case reassigned to US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf pursuant to #11 Joint Stipulation of Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Chief Judge Martin Reidinger no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kby) |
| Filing 11 Joint Stipulation of CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge filed by all parties. (Carpenter, Kimberly) |
| Filing 10 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan . ALL Parties Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction (Carpenter, Kimberly) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ricky Donovan Marr.(Carpenter, Kimberly) |
| TEXT-ONLY ORDER finding as moot #7 Motion to Amend/Correct Text of Order: ORDER: In light of the order granting the Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, the earlier filed Motion for Leave to Amend is DENIED AS MOOT. So Ordered. Entered by US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 9/21/2023. (kkb) |
| TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 Motion to Amend/Correct Text of Order: ORDER: The Consent Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file, on or before September 25, 2023, the Amended Complaint (Doc. 8-1). So Ordered. Entered by US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 9/21/2023. (kkb) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Amend/Correct #7 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint Complaint by Ricky Donovan Marr. Responses due by 10/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Proposed Amended Complaint) (Carpenter, Kimberly). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Ricky Donovan Marr. Responses due by 10/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint) (Carpenter, Kimberly). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf. |
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Ricky Donovan Marr. (Carpenter, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 10/3/2023. (kby) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by MJS Trucking LLC, Max Robensky Sainvelus.(Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by MJS Trucking LLC. (Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Max Robensky Sainvelus. (Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MJS Trucking LLC. (Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jackson County Superior Court, case number 23-CVS-494. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6215335), filed by MJS Trucking LLC, Max Robensky Sainvelus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Demand Letter, #2 Exhibit B. State Court Pleadings)(Peoples, Lucienne) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (cly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
