Beaver v. Pfizer Incorporated
Plaintiff: Barbara Beaver
Defendant: Pfizer Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2023cv00281
Filed: October 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Surreply/RESPONSE to Defendants #9 Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Barbara Beaver. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (cly)
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Pfizer Incorporated. (Garofalo, Mel)
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion To #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Barbara Beaver. Replies due by 11/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (cly)
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Pfizer Incorporated. (Garofalo, Mel)
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Pfizer Incorporated. Responses due by 10/25/2023 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Garofalo, Mel)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Pfizer Incorporated. (D'Ambrosio, Kristy).
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Deleted Duplicate Document, see document no. 3. Modified on 10/12/2023. NEF Regenerated (ejb).
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (cly)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pfizer Incorporated. (Garofalo, Mel)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristy Marie D'Ambrosio on behalf of Pfizer Incorporated (D'Ambrosio, Kristy)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Rutherford County Superior Court, case number 23-CVS-966. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6245650), filed by Pfizer Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint filed 08/29/23 in State Court, #3 Exhibit B - Original Complaint filed 06/14/22 in State Court, #4 Exhibit C - Copies of process, pleadings, orders served on Pfizer)(Garofalo, Mel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaver v. Pfizer Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Beaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer Incorporated
Represented By: Kristy Marie D'Ambrosio
Represented By: Mel Joseph Garofalo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?