Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Delia G. Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Case Number: 1:2023cv00347
Filed: November 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Kenneth D Bell
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to notify the Commissioner of the commencement of this action in accordance with Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 11/29/2023. (mek)
November 29, 2023 Notice to answer Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on or by 60 days from the filing of this notice. (Commissioner of Social Security answer due 1/29/2024.) (mek)
November 29, 2023 Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3; The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. (mek)
November 28, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Delia G. Smith. (Dalton, Aaron)
November 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Delia G. Smith.(Dalton, Aaron)
November 28, 2023 Case assigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (cly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delia G. Smith
Represented By: Aaron Lee Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Represented By: US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Noticing
Represented By: SSA Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?