Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Employees et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Daniel Pippinger
Defendant: Buncombe County Government Employees, Buncombe County Corrections Officers, Mediko, Central Intalectual Industries Mental Health and Buncombe County Jail Mail Room
Case Number: 1:2023cv00355
Filed: December 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2024 Filing 4 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smm)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk, Katherine Hord Simon. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (smm)
December 19, 2023 Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Prisoner Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (cly)
December 14, 2023 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly)
December 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buncombe County Government Employees, Buncombe County Corrections Officers, Mediko, Central Intalectual Industries Mental Health, Buncombe County Jail Mail Room, filed by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Employees et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Daniel Pippinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buncombe County Government Employees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buncombe County Corrections Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mediko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intalectual Industries Mental Health
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buncombe County Jail Mail Room
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?