Mahida et al v. Jaddou
Hirenkumar Motisinh Mahida and Kinjalkumari Gohel |
Ur M. Jaddou |
1:2024cv00013 |
January 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kinjalkumari Gohel, Hirenkumar Motisinh Mahida (Chavez, Halston) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan M. Warren on behalf of All Defendants (Warren, Jonathan) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hirenkumar Motisinh Mahida, Kinjalkumari Gohel. Ur M. Jaddou served on 1/20/2024, answer due 3/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits to Proof of Service)(Chavez, Halston) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Ur M. Jaddou, US Attorney and US Attorney General. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (ejb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6368783), filed by Hirenkumar Motisinh Mahida, Kinjalkumari Gohel. (Attachments: #1 *Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Chavez, Halston) Modified *text of attachment # 1 to remove duplicate text on 1/17/2024. NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (ejb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.