Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
Andrew D. Anderson |
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III, The Office of the North Carolina Supreme Court Chief Justice, Cheri Beasley, Paul Newby, North Carolina Superior Court District 30, Bradley B. Letts, North Carolina District Court, Roy T. Wijewickrama, Kristina L. Earwood, Kaleb D. Wingate, Dona F. Forga, John J. Pavey, Jr., Jared R. Davis, The Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Joshua Stein, The 43rd Prosecutorial District, The Office of the District Attorney, Ashley H. Welch, Christina B. Matheson, Andrew C. Buckner, Jacob P. Phelps, Jennaca D. Hughs, Sumer L. Allen, Jackson County North Carolina, Jackson County Sheriff's Department, The Office of the Sherriff, Chip L. Hall, CNA Surety, Heather Baker, Shannon H. Queen, Ann D. Melton, The Office of the Jackson County Clerk of Superior Court, The Office of the Jackson County Magistrate, Jeffery W. Powell, Samuel K. Bowers, Tyler B. Bryson, Derek A. Robinson, Megan L. Rhinehart, Kathleen D. Breedlove, Southwestern Community College, Lynn P. Dann, Cheryl L. Contino-Conner, Barbara B. Putman, Thomas R. Brooks, John Does, Jane Does and The Office of the Sheriff |
1:2024cv00034 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.