Smith v. Staton et al
| Brian Mark Smith |
| FNU Staton and FNU Joker |
| 1:2024cv00050 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Pro Se NOTICE of Change of Address by Brian Mark Smith (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj) |
Filing 10
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Brian Mark Smith and directing correctional facility to transmit payments. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (smm)
|
| Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) by Brian Mark Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope) (cly) |
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) filed by Cleveland County Detention Center as to Brian Mark Smith. (Attachments: #1 Order to Cure Deficiency, #2 Envelope From Cleveland County Detention Center) (cly) |
| Filing 7 Mail (NEF of Text Only Notice eod 2/27/2024) addressed to Brian Mark Smith, 838280607, Cleveland County Jail, 100 Justice Place, Shelby, NC, 28150 returned as undeliverable. Envelope stamped: RTS, not in jail. (Attachments: #1 NEF of Text-Only Order) (cly) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Brian Mark Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: The Clerk has received the #4 Mail Returned, #5 Mail Returned, as undeliverable. Pursuant to I(D)(3) of the Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means and the Order of Instructions: A pro se party whose e-mail address, mailing address, telephone or fax number has changed shall promptly notify the Clerk of a change of address and serve a copy of the notice on all other parties. Failure to promptly notify the Clerk of any such changes may result in the dismissal of the pro se plaintiff's action or, in the case of a pro se defendant, the entry of judgment against such defendant. Brian Mark Smith is directed to update their address with the Clerk within 14 days of the date of this Notice. (Copy of this Notice, a Notice of Change of Address Form mailed to pro se litigant at Cleveland County Jail, 100 Justice Place, Shelby, NC, 28150.) (cly) |
| Filing 5 Mail (Order for Prisoner Trust Account Statement) addressed to Brian Mark Smith, Cleveland County Jail, 100 Justice Place Shelby, NC, 28150 returned as undeliverable. Envelope stamped Return to sender; Not in Jail. (Attachments: #1 Order to Cure Deficiency) (cly) |
| Filing 4 Mail (Standing Order of Instructions, public docket sheet) addressed to Brian Mark Smith, Cleveland County Jail, 100 Justice Place Shelby, NC, 28150 returned as undeliverable. Envelope stamped Return to sender; Not in Jail. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (cly) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk, Katherine Hord Simon. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (smm)
|
| Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Prisoner Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(tlj) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Brian Mark Smith (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope)(tlj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brian Mark Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope, #4 Envelope)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
