Equis Financial, LLC v. Yacoub et al
Equis Financial, LLC |
Dawn Wientjes, Mena Yacoub, Marvin Cox, Carlyle Holder, Reginald Beausejour, Daelen Friar, Jennifer Jordan, Kyle Brown and Bria Adger |
1:2024cv00177 |
June 21, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Contract: Other |
Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Equis Financial, LLC (Chang, Jimmy) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Equis Financial, LLC. (Chang, Jimmy) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equis Financial, LLC. (Chang, Jimmy) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bria Adger, Reginald Beausejour, Kyle Brown, Marvin Cox, Daelen Friar, Carlyle Holder, Jennifer Jordan, Dawn Wientjes, Mena Yacoub. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (cly) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6566196), filed by Equis Financial, LLC.(Chang, Jimmy) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Martin Reidinger and US Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document. (cly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.